- Arts & Culture 6212
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 129
- Website Promotion 68
In February 1998, the Qualification Collegium of Judges
Content: S19-361.docx 18,3 kB
Product description
In February 1998, the qualification collegium of judges of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug dismissed the applicant to the European Court of Human Rights, a citizen of the Russian Federation P., a judge of the district court of Noyabrsk and a member of the Zhivaya Vera church from the position of a judge due to abuse of her official position for the implementation of religious activities in the interests of the church.
P. filed a complaint with the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation. In May 1998, the College rejected P.´s complaint, after which she filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation - the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation acknowledged that the applicant was engaged in church propaganda and religious intimidation of the parties in the process by which she was appointed judge.
Have the applicant exhausted all domestic remedies, as required by paragraph 1 of Art. 35 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms? Was there a case, according to the applicant, of a violation of Art. 9, 10 and 14 of the Convention?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |