- Arts & Culture 6212
- Business & Economics 673
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 129
- Website Promotion 68
Indicate in which of the following cases
Content: S19-136.docx 13,49 kB
Product description
ndicate in which of the following cases and under what conditions a reversal of execution of a court decision is possible:
A) the decision of the justice of the peace satisfied the claim for the recovery of alimony for the maintenance of the child. By the decision of the district court, the claim was denied;
B) the decision of the supervisory court reversed the decision of the district court to recover the loan amount due to the falsity of the debt receipt;
C) the decision of the district court reversed the decision of the justice of the peace to recover earnings for the duration of the lower-paid work in view of the plaintiff’s refusal of the claim;
D) by the decision of the justice of the peace, the debt under the debt receipt of September 1, 1995 in the amount of 30 thousand rubles was recovered. Prior to the entry into force of the decision, the defendant paid the plaintiff 10 thousand rubles. By the decision of the district court on the appeal of the defendant, the decision of the justice of the peace was canceled, the claim was denied due to the absence of valid reasons for the plaintiff to miss the limitation period;
E) The decision of the district court satisfied the claim for reinstatement. By the ruling of the supervisory review court, this decision was canceled due to a substantial violation of substantive law, the claim was denied.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |