- Arts & Culture 6212
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
Joint stock company appealed to the court
Content: S18-372.docx 13,19 kB
Product description
The joint stock company appealed to the court to commit the individual entrepreneur to accept the delivered products and to recover the interest under art. 395 of the Civil Code. In support of its claims, it referred to the supply agreement concluded with it, and to the fact that the individual entrepreneur had evaded acceptance of the delivered products. Since, in accordance with the contract, only accepted products are subject to payment, by refusing to accept them, the individual entrepreneur evades payment for them. In this regard, the joint-stock company has losses that can be covered by the amount assessed under Art. 395 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
The sole proprietor, in response to their claim, indicated that the supply contract considered not concluded due to an uncoordinated price condition. The company gave him two copies of the signed contract. Where the price was set too high for the goods. He signed the contract, but with the proviso that he concludes it only on condition that the goods are delivered at the price offered by him. The joint-stock company immediately began shipping the products without notifying them of the consent to the new price.
The general director of the company, during the court session, confirmed receipt of one copy of the contract and said that he had seen the reservation. He explained to the court that he had agreed to a new price in a telephone conversation. Consequently, the contract was concluded.
Solve the case.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |