Measures of restraint in criminal proceedings (2017)

CONTENT

Introduction 3
1. The concept, general characteristics and significance of preventive measures 6
2. Practice of application of separate preventive measures 12
3. Problems of application of preventive measures 22
Conclusion 29
List of used sources and literature 32

LIST OF SOURCES USED AND LITERATURE

Regulations

1. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 (Rome, 4 November 1950) (as amended and as of September 21, 1970, December 20, 1971, January 1, 1990, November 6 1990, May 11, 1994) // collected legislation of the Russian Federation. 1998. № 20. Art. 2143.
2. UN General Assembly Resolution No. 45/110 of December 14, 1990, “United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (the Tokyo Rules)”. New York: United Nations, 1992.
3. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation dated June 13, 1996 No. 63-FZ (as amended on July 29, 2017 No. 250-FZ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. № 25. Art. 2954.
4. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ (as amended on July 29, 2017 No. 251-ФЗ) // Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation. 2001. No. 52 (1 h.). Art. 4921.
5. Resolution of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of February 15, 1923 "On the approval of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR" (along with the "Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR") (expired) // SU RSFSR. 1923. № 7. Art. 106
6. Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR of October 27, 1960 (expired) // Vedomosti Supreme Council of the RSFSR. 1960. No. 40. Art. 592.

Practice materials

7. Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of January 25, 2005 No. 42-O "According to complaints from citizens of Astakhov Pavel Alekseevich, Zamoshkin Sergey Dmitrievich, Kartseva Vera Konstantinovna and Kostanov Yury Artemovich on violation of constitutional rights and freedoms by the provisions of articles 7 and 123, part three of the article 124, articles 125, 388 and 408 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation "[Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/1254163. (the date of the appeal: 10.25.2017).
8. Decision of the ECHR dated December 14, 2006, “Shcheglyuk case (Russian Federation)” (Complaint No. 7649/02) // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights. 2007. No. 7.
9. Resolution of the ECHR dated July 30, 2009 “Case“ Sergey Medvedev (Sergey Medvedev) v. The Russian Federation ”(Complaint No. 3194/08) // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights. 2013. No. 1.
10. Resolution of the ECHR dated February 10, 2011 “Case“ Pelevin (Pelevin) against the Russian Federation ”(complaint No. 38726/05) [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online .cgi? req = doc; base = ARB; n = 236676 # 0. (appeal date: 10/27/2017).
11. Resolution of the ECHR dated June 28, 2011, The Miminoshvili Case (Miminoshvili) v. Russia (Complaint No. 20197/03) // Russian Chronicle of the European Court. 2012. No. 2.
12. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 41 dated December 19, 2013 (Ed. Dated May 24, 2016 No. 23) “On the practice of the courts applying the law on measures of restraint in the form of detention, house arrest and bail” [Electronic resource ]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_156184/. (the date of the appeal: 10.25.2017).
13. Cassation definition of the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the Moscow City Court of August 29, 2012 in case No. 3 / 1-400 / 12 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/U9vEkoCxv9Vm/. (the date of the appeal: 10/20/2017).
14. Cassation definition of the Judicial Collegium for Criminal Cases of the North-Caucasian District Military Court of January 26, 2012 in case No. 22K-37/2012 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/V6HllqA6Fdg3/. (the date of the appeal: 10/20/2017).
15. Appeal definition of the Judicial C