- Arts & Culture 6212
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
April 5, 2006 between CITY OJSC
Content: S19-822.docx 17,23 kB
Product description
On April 5, 2006, CITI, represented by the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Gavrilova, entered into an employment contract for a period of three years, in accordance with which Gavrilova was appointed to the post of President of CITI. Clause 3 of Article 7 of the said agreement establishes that in case of termination before its expiration by decision of the Board of Directors, the president shall be paid compensation for early termination of the agreement in the amount equivalent to $ 100,000 no later than one month from the date of such decision. On May 27, 2007, the plaintiff was dismissed from her position under paragraph 2 of Article 278 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the adoption by the Board of Directors of CITI OJSC of a decision on the early termination of the employment contract. Compensation to the employee was not paid, in connection with which Gavrilova was forced to go to court.
Refusing to satisfy the requirements, the court proceeded from the fact that paragraph 3 of article 7 of the contract contradicts article 279 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, since the contract does not stipulate the payment of compensation in the presence or absence of guilty actions of the employee, as required by the specified legal norm.
Do you agree with the court decision?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |