- Arts & Culture 6209
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76835
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4010
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17567
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 892
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
At the direction of investigator G., police officers
Content: S20-008.docx 16,81 kB
Product description
At the direction of investigator G., police officers V. and L. detained S., who was suspected of committing theft with penetration into his home (Part 3 of Article 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and kept him in the premises of the internal affairs bodies for 5 days. After that, G. questioned S. as a witness, warning him of responsibility for giving false testimonies and for refusing to testify. Having promised S. to release him, as well as to terminate the criminal case in accordance with Article 75 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, having demonstrated a falsified conclusion of a fingerprint examination, G. obtained a confession from the suspect (which was true). Later, however, G. drew up the detention record of S. (indicating that he had been detained on the day of the interrogation), charged him, prepared a motion to the court to apply a preventive measure in the form of detention (he received such a court decision a day later) . Subsequently, S. was convicted (a falsified expert opinion was not attached to the criminal case).
Give a criminal law assessment of the deed.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |