- Arts & Culture 6213
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 129
- Website Promotion 68
Citizen K., not having a status
Content: S19-117.docx 15,65 kB
Product description
Citizen K., who does not have the status of an individual entrepreneur, filed a lawsuit challenging the order of the Ministry of Taxes and Dues of the Russian Federation, establishing the procedure for registration as an individual entrepreneur and the requirements for the documents submitted.
The Oktyabrskiy Federal District Court of Yekaterinburg refused to accept the application, stating in the determination that K.´s claims are not subject to civil proceedings, because in accordance with the provisions of Article 138 of the Tax Code, the arbitration court is directly named as a court competent to consider these cases .
The Arbitration Court of the Sverdlovsk Region left K.´s statement of claim without motion, indicating that it needs to draw up its claims in the form of a statement, since a case to challenge a normative legal act can only be considered in accordance with Article 191-196 of the APC, which are located in the section “Proceedings under cases arising from administrative and other public legal relations ”
Did the courts do the right thing?
Evaluate the correctness of the arguments of the courts and the adequacy of the legal grounds underlying their definitions.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2004-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |