- Arts & Culture 6126
- Business & Economics 670
- Computers 309
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 68
- Education & Science 75536
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 3115
- Coursework 15556
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 317
- Drawings 1174
- Ecology 5
- Economy 82
- English 78
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17220
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13869
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 15094
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 155
- Tests 7905
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 366
- Works 13
- Информатика 9
- Engineering 875
- Fiction 670
- House, Family & Entertainment 89
- Law 133
- Website Promotion 71
Civil law
Refunds: 0
Uploaded: 29.10.2014
Content: 41029225343767.rar 12,29 kB
![](/img/icon-merchant-0.png)
Seller will give you a gift certificate in the amount of
Product description
As part of this study following tasks:
1) In March 2011, MA handed over his damaged in an accident VAZ-2109 for repair workers UAB "Horizon" B. and P., who with the help of crane and trucks owned by the Company, the car was taken to the territory of the said M. the organization received from M. advance of 50% of the cost of the work to repair the car in the amount of 25 000 rubles. The work was supposed to be completed within two weeks.
During repairs it was found out that the body needs to be replaced. Since the desired body stock Company was not, B. and P. asked for a stay of execution obligations. Then M. demanded the return of his car and pay damages. B. and P. agreed to return the car, but refused to pay the damages, demanding in turn, reimbursement already made by them in connection with the repair of the vehicle.
M. went to court to demand that the Company "Horizon" for the return of the vehicle and damages. The defendant with the claims not agree, citing the absence of a contractual relationship with M.
1. What the contract was concluded under the terms of the problem, who are its members, what are the essential terms of the contract?
2. What decision should stand trial?
3. What decision will make the court, if the period of the trial there was a fire in the garage, in which a car was destroyed by M.?
2) "Legal Company" Justa Causa "" applied to the Moscow Arbitration Court with a claim to the LLC "Strojservis" on recovery of 50 thousand rubles fine in accordance with paragraph 5.4 of the agreement on legal assistance, in accordance with which provides that in the case of termination of the contract by the customer (LLC "Strojservis"), or he commits actions (inaction), entailing the impossibility of execution of the order (including the rejection of the claim, revocation), he must pay penalty in the amount of 50 000 rubles.
In support of the claim for the recovery of a fine law firm pointed out that, pursuant to the terms of the agreement between the parties, it provided services to the study presented by LLC "Strojservis" documents prepared and filed with the Moscow Arbitration Court lawsuit to recover the debt with the contractor of "Strojservis" .
However, Ltd. "Strojservis" in connection with the agreement reached with the management of the debtor in accordance with para. 1, Art. 782 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation informed the law firm of termination of contractual relations and the abolition of the power of attorney issued to them.
LLC "Strojservis" turned counter-claim against the law firm to invalidate the (insignificant) of paragraph 5.4 of the agreement on the basis of para. 1, Art. 782 of the Civil Code. The decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court claim law firm was granted. The satisfaction of the counterclaim of "Strojservis" was denied. LLC "Strojservis" appealed the trial court´s decision in the Court of Appeal.
1. Can the part of a service agreement to cancel the agreement?
2. Can the contract paid services impose restrictions on the rights of the parties unilateral refusal to perform the contract?
3. Subject to the satisfaction of any appeal of "Build-Service"?
References: 5 sources
Volume: 11 pages
14 size, half interval
Date of writing the work - 2014.
The work was evaluated on the "ex"
Seller warrants that:
1) This work was his own and is not a copy-paste (borrowing) from the Internet.
2) Originality of the work at the time of writing is higher than 50% of Antiplagiat.ru (ETXT-antiplagiat).
3) If the original work at the time of sale will be equal to 0-20%, the seller will give you back your money paid.
4) for the positive feedback on this product you get a 10% discount on the purchase of another product of the same seller (AntonV2).
Remember - buy ready-made work
Feedback
1Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |
![](/img/gift_icon.png)