Гражданское право

  • USD
    • RUB
    • USD
    • EUR
Affiliates: 0,1 $how to earn
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 5 last one 27.10.2018
Refunds: 0

Uploaded: 26.03.2007
Content: r2003-03.rar 8,92 kB

Product description

1. Ivanov got in store Ltd. "Ray" TV. After 3 months the TV broke and Ivanov took him for warranty repair of "Salute" - an organization that has been specified in the warranty card. Since the TV is in the repair of 80 days, Ivanov presented LLC "Salute" claim for a penalty of 1% per day of the value of the television (2000 rubles) worth 1,200 rubles. Ltd. "Salut" objected to the claim, saying that the delay in execution of works on the Law of the Russian Federation on the "Consumer Protection" the amount of the penalty is limited to the sum of the cost of the work, which is only 300 rubles. The court granted the petition in part Ivanova 300 rubles, 900 rubles in collecting refused. Is entered court?
2. Ivanov and his family (wife and daughter 13 years) were evicted from the apartment in the municipal building (insulated bedroom living area of \u200b\u200b26 sq. Meters) due to the fact that the house was subject to conversion to non-residential. Ivanov, a warrant was issued for the isolated two-room apartment of 27 square meters. meters. However, it turned out that the right to use the said flat owned c. Petrov - worker trade missions abroad, who, after returning from a long trip, sued for recognition of a warrant issued by the family of the Ivanovs invalid and eviction. In court, he submitted a Security Certificate (reservation) on the flat. To participate in the local administration was involved. The Court ruled that a warrant invalid and obligation of the administration to provide the Ivanov family more living space. Based on the rule of Art. 100 LCD RSFSR the administration has decided to issue a warrant for Ivanov JP-bedroom apartment of 18 sq. meters. (Social norm in the region of 6 sq. Meters of living space). Is the court's decision? Administration?
3. The leasing company has acquired and transferred to leasing company "Luch" equipment for the production of sunflower oil. During the operation of the equipment was necessary overhaul. Ltd. "Ray" appealed to the leasing company with the requirement to make repairs. The condition of the lease agreement on the allocation of responsibilities for production repair and overhaul absent. Reasonably a requirement of "Ray"?
4. Ivanov, immediately leaving for a trip abroad, Petrov agreed that the latter will hand in the hiring of an apartment belonging to him for the period of his assignment (one year). His relationship side of the agreement drawn up in writing, in which it was determined the content of the order. Moreover, Ivanov, Petrov gave a power of attorney, however, due to the rush, he designed it on general power of attorney form. Upon returning Ivanov found his apartment rented in employment for three years. He demanded the recognition of the contract null and void due to the fact that he went out, beyond the powers granted to him. Employers objected to the claims submitted, explaining that he was represented by a power of attorney, in which no restrictions of rights attorney is not contained, the contract also order them not to represent. How to resolve the dispute?
5. LLC "Ray" applied to the Arbitration Court with the claim to the issuing bank and the nominated bank for reimbursement of the amounts paid unjustifiably recipient of funds from the Credit. The complainant pointed out that the nominated bank did not have to make payments on the basis of the documents submitted as actual goods are not shipped. JSC "Bonus" (recipient of funds) actually ceased to exist, in connection with which it received a refund of funds impossible. The fact of manufacturing employees of the organization receiving the fake consignment documents confirmed the verdict of the court in a criminal case. Arbitration Court upheld the claim by the executing bank, stating that he was not properly checked the documents submitted to it. Reference banks in the absence of guilt in causing da

Additional information

Verification work commissioned in 2004


1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)

This website uses cookies to provide a more effective user experience. See our Cookie policy for details.