- Arts & Culture 6062
- Business & Economics 668
- Computers 314
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 68
- Education & Science 76044
- Abstracts 74
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2819
- Coursework 15557
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 317
- Drawings 854
- Ecology 5
- Economy 82
- English 78
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17583
- Foreign Languages 12
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13869
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 15076
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 155
- Tests 8681
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 366
- Works 13
- Информатика 9
- Engineering 870
- Fiction 679
- House, Family & Entertainment 89
- Law 134
- Website Promotion 71
In the spring, a lonely pensioner Ruchkin
Content: S19-902.docx 16,86 kB
Product description
In the spring, a lone pensioner Ruchkin planted opium poppy on his plot of land among flowers and vegetables. In early summer, he was hospitalized for a long time, instructing his neighbor Somov to look after the house and stipulating that there was no need to look after the plantings. However, Somov, having discovered that a drug-containing plant was planted and is already beginning to wilt, decided to grow it until Ruchkin returned, hoping that, in gratitude, Ruchkin would share his ripened crop with him. All summer he looked after the crops, watered them, weeded, and fertilized. His calculation turned out to be correct - in the fall Ruchkin and Somov gathered a large crop of ripened poppy, halving it.
Uncover the objective and subjective signs of complicity in the crime and decide whether Ruchkin and Somov are accomplices in the crime. Argument your answer, including an analysis of the subjective relationship between partners.
From the standpoint of the doctrine of complicity, give a criminal legal assessment of the acts of each of these persons under the following options for the conditions of the task.
Option 1. Somov’s calculation turned out to be incorrect - the “ungrateful” Ruchkin, returning from the hospital and collecting a crop of poppy grown by Somov, did not share with him.
Option 2. Going to the hospital, Ruchkin told Somov about the crops, an agreement was reached between them that Somov would grow opium poppy and take the whole crop for himself.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |