Individual entrepreneur concluded an agreement

Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 0 Uploaded: 30.09.2019
Content: S19-059.docx 13,49 kB

Product description

An individual entrepreneur entered into a contract of carriage with MUE "Auto Farm".
In connection with the improper fulfillment of obligations under the contract, the entrepreneur sued the municipal unitary enterprise for the recovery of funds.
During the court hearing, the arbitration court found that MUE "Auto Farm" five months ago was reorganized into GUP "Avtokolonna No. 6". After establishing this circumstance, the arbitral tribunal replaced the improper party.
Did the arbitration court do the right thing?
What is the difference between the replacement of the inappropriate party from the entry into the successor process?

Additional information

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2004-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.

Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)