- Arts & Culture 6209
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76871
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17567
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 892
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
Member of the housing cooperative Kotova
Content: S19-186.docx 16,85 kB
Product description
A member of the housing cooperative Kotova died in 2006, she lived in a one-room apartment, at the time of her death she paid 95 percent of the share contribution for the apartment. A member of this cooperative Kuznetsov applied for a vacated apartment. Kuznetsov at a general meeting of members of the cooperative said that he needed housing, since their family of six lives in a 2-room apartment (Kuznetsov himself, his wife, their son with his wife and two minor children). Kuznetsov believed that he had a pre-emptive right to provide him with this apartment. A member of the same cooperative Podrebernikova also filed an application for the provision of this apartment to her. She explained that she was a close friend of Kotova, provided financial assistance to her, and took care of her. Podrebernikova also provided a notarized testament to Kotova, according to which Kotova bequeathed a share to her, Podrebernikova. The general meeting of the cooperative decided to provide the vacated apartment to Kuznetsov on the grounds that Podrebernikova lives alone in a two-room apartment, her husband Podrebernikova died, her daughter lives with her family in another city. Podrebernikova herself fully paid the share fee for the apartment and is its owner. Thus, Podrebernikova housing is provided. Housing conditions of Kuznetsov are much worse, therefore, Kotova’s vacated apartment should be provided for use to him. As for the will of Kotova, then, according to the members of the cooperative, Podrebernikova bequeathed precisely the share that the housing cooperative will pay Kotova. Kotova appealed the decision of the general meeting of the cooperative to the court and demanded that Kotova’s apartment be provided for her use. Settle the dispute on the merits. What decision will the court make?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |