On July 15, a district court ruled

On July 15, the district court ruled to partially satisfy the claims on the claim of Perkevich to recover 10 thousand rubles. under a loan and penalty agreement with Babin. On the complaint of Babin, the prosecutor requested the case for review and on July 19 brought a cassation appeal. The next day, the judge sent the case file along with the prosecutor´s submission to the cassation instance. On July 30, the district court received a cassation appeal from Perkevich, who at the same time asked to restore the missed time limit for the cassation appeal, since he could not timely get acquainted with the case materials and did this only in the cassation instance court after receiving a copy of the cassation submission from the prosecutor. The judge rejected the request for the restoration of the term, believing that the plaintiff could express his opinion as objections to the cassation appeal.
Are the actions of a district judge legitimate?
Is the prosecutor entitled to request case materials for review?
In this case, is the prosecutor entitled to bring a cassation appeal?