- Arts & Culture 6209
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76835
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4010
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17567
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 892
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
Share capital and book value of assets
Content: S19-561.docx 16,8 kB
Product description
The authorized capital and book value of the assets of Uraltechprom JSC are 100 and 200 million rubles, respectively. Its general director concluded a sale and purchase agreement with Zarya LLC, according to which the machines, equipment and storage facilities belonging to Uraltekhprom JSC were transferred to the latter. The buyer transferred the purchase price to the seller’s bank account - 80 million rubles.
The Dorozhnik cooperative (a shareholder of Uraltechprom), through an arbitration court, demanded that the transaction be declared invalid and that the property transferred under the agreement be returned to the balance sheet of Uraltechprom JSC. He argued that the transaction was completed by the general director of the company in excess of authority, and when transferring the property to the buyer, acts of acceptance and transfer of property and a deed of transfer were not drawn up.
At the hearing, it turned out that after the execution of the contract of sale, the transaction was discussed by the board of directors of the joint-stock company and 75% of its payroll approved it.
Another shareholder of Uraltechprom, LLC Remstroy, challenged in an arbitration court an agreement concluded by the general director of the joint-stock company on the purchase of raw materials for the production of basic products, according to which the buyer paid the supplier 55 million rubles. The reason was also the excess by the general director of the company of his own authority. At a meeting of the board of directors of Uraltechprom JSC, this transaction was not considered.
Give an analysis of the situation.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |