- Arts & Culture 6845
- Business & Economics 667
- Computers 318
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 76515
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 5
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4833
- Coursework 15612
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 325
- Drawings 1597
- Ecology 5
- Economy 81
- English 81
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17433
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 37
- Maps & Atlases 3
- Mathematics 11888
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 21
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15123
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 65
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 88
- Test Answers 164
- Tests 8411
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 408
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 717
- Fiction 709
- House, Family & Entertainment 86
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 72
The organization on its own carried out the constructio
Content: S18-257.docx 12,62 kB
Product description
The organization on its own carried out the construction of a garage for their own needs. Subsequently, the construction was suspended, the garage as an object not completed with construction was transferred to the balance of the organization.
The municipal enterprise, without the knowledge of the owner, dismantled the garage and removed the concrete slabs, using them further for their own purposes.
Since the return of the plates in kind was impossible, the organization appealed to the enterprise with a claim for recovery of damages resulting from the illegal actions of the defendant. The plaintiff required to recover the cost of the exported plates and the costs incurred during their installation.
Considering that there is an obligation on the side of the defendant as a result of unjust enrichment, the claimant based his requirements on the norms of Articles 1102, 1105 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
The respondent in the response to the claim indicated that there was no obligation due to unjust enrichment. In this case, there was an infliction of non-contractual harm. The Code provides for special rules governing the procedure for compensation for harm, and therefore, by virtue of sub-clause 1 of Article 1103 of the Code, claims for the return of unjust enrichment cannot be satisfied.
Solve the matter on the merits.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |