- Arts & Culture 6209
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
The organization on its own carried out the constructio
Refunds: 0
Uploaded: 10.12.2018
Content: S18-365.docx 13,15 kB
Product description
The organization on its own carried out the construction of a garage for their own needs. Subsequently, the construction was suspended, the garage as an object not completed with construction was transferred to the balance of the organization.
The municipal enterprise, without the knowledge of the owner, dismantled the garage and removed the concrete slabs, using them in the future for their own purposes.
Since the return of the plates in kind was impossible, the organization appealed to the enterprise with a claim for the recovery of damages resulting from the illegal actions of the defendant. The plaintiff required to recover the cost of exported plates and the costs incurred during their installation.
Considering that there is an obligation on the side of the defendant as a result of unjust enrichment, the claimant based his requirements on the norms of Articles 1102, 1105 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
The respondent, in response to the claim, indicated that there was no obligation due to unjust enrichment. In this case, there was an infliction of non-contractual harm. The Code provides for special rules governing the procedure for compensation for harm, and therefore, by virtue of sub-clause 1 of Article 1103 of the Code, claims for the return of unjust enrichment cannot be satisfied.
Solve the matter on the merits.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |