- Arts & Culture 6209
- Business & Economics 674
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76841
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4016
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17567
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 892
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 128
- Website Promotion 68
Citizen Rublev appealed to court
Content: S19-218.docx 17,96 kB
Product description
Citizen Rublev appealed to the court with a claim against the Rus agricultural firm to allocate a land plot from its lands to organize peasant (farm) farming on it. In substantiating his requirements, he indicated that he was a member of the collective farm "Testament of Ilyich", which was later transformed into the agricultural company "Rus." The transformation (reorganization) of the collective farm, which was a specialized farm for raising heifers as part of the agricultural firm Domodedovsky, took place in two stages: in 1992, the collective farm was transformed into an association of peasant farms - entrepreneurs under the same name and profile as part of the combine " Domodedovo ”, and in 1993 all structural divisions of the plant, including the collective farm“ Testament of Ilyich ”, were transformed into the agricultural company“ Rus ”with the preservation of their specialization.
The representative of the defendant, objecting to the lawsuit, explained to the court that it was not possible to allocate land to the plaintiff, since the Rus farm is a livestock complex, has a large herd of cattle, and grows its own young stock to repair the herd. The farm is experiencing an acute shortage of land for the production of its own feed. In addition, Rublev worked on the collective farm until it was reorganized into an association of peasant farms for only 1 day and refused to join the association.
Was Rublev rightfully denied the allocation of a land share during the reorganization of the collective farm "Testament Ilyich" into an association of peasant farms due to the short duration of his work on the collective farm?
Does Rublev have the right to receive a land plot from the lands of the agricultural company Rus?
Solve the case.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |