- Arts & Culture 6212
- Business & Economics 673
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 74
- Education & Science 76877
- Abstracts 73
- Astrology 4
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 4046
- Coursework 15549
- Culture 8
- Diplomas 316
- Drawings 1595
- Ecology 5
- Economy 76
- English 80
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17573
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 88
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 12624
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 22
- Physics 15120
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 59
- Psychology 63
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 160
- Tests 8747
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 7
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 38
- Vetting 385
- Works 13
- Информатика 8
- Engineering 893
- Fiction 706
- House, Family & Entertainment 84
- Law 129
- Website Promotion 68
Lebedev sued the hotel "Yubileinaya"
Content: S18-231.docx 13,24 kB
Product description
Lebedev sued the hotel "Yubileinaya" for the recovery of the cost of a coat, suit, electric razors that were stolen from him during his stay at the hotel. The hotel objected to the suit, referring to the fact that Lebedev was in a dormitory room and, in accordance with the order of the hotel administration, was to hand over his belongings to a locker that operates in the hotel around the clock. The order also states that the administration is not responsible for the loss of items from the hotel’s rooms that were not handed over to the storage room. This order was posted in a hotel in a prominent place, and Lebedev could not be unaware of the rules established at the hotel.
Lebedev’s lawyer drew the court’s attention to the fact that the disposal of the hotel’s administration is not a regulatory act and is contrary to Art. 925 GK, in accordance with which the hotel is responsible as a keeper and without a special agreement about that with the person (guest) living in it for the loss, shortage or damage of his belongings brought to the hotel.
The representative of the hotel, in turn, referred to clause 31 of the Rules for staying at hotels in the city, approved by the head of the city administration, which states that the hotel is not responsible for the loss of things not deposited.
What decision should make the court?
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0| Period | |||
| 1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |