- Arts & Culture 5948
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 316
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 76395
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2513
- Coursework 15702
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 571
- Ecology 6
- Economy 82
- English 77
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17627
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13871
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14894
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 151
- Tests 9243
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 364
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3062
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Limited Liability Company "Kvant"
Refunds: 0
Uploaded: 10.12.2018
Content: S18-360.docx 15,44 kB
Product description
The Kvant limited liability company (tenant) filed a claim with the court of arbitration against Caesar CJSC (subtenant) about evicting it from the occupied premises.
The court found that the city property management committee (the landlord) concluded in 2000 a contract for the lease of non-residential premises for a period of 10 years with OJSC Polyanka (the former tenant). In 2004, with the consent of the committee (lessor), OJSC Polyanka, one of the leased premises, Cesar CJSC (the respondent in this case) was sublet for 5 years. In 2005, the city property management committee, Polyanka OJSC, Kvant LLC (plaintiff) signed an agreement, in accordance with which Polyanka OJSC transferred its rights and obligations under the lease agreement to the renewal of Kvant LLC. The latter committed to overhaul and renovate the entire building at its own expense. The new tenant (the plaintiff of Kvant LLC) believed that since the conclusion of the above contract, the sublease contract with Caesar CJSC was terminated, since the rights and obligations of the tenant were transferred by the former tenant in the order of renegotiation, and not as a result of a new contract with the owner of the premises.
Solve the case.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |