Control work on the subject "Organization of advocacy", contains a solution of 6 tasks and a list of used literature.
Task 1. List the principles of the organization and activities of the Bar and disclose the content of these principles.
Task 2. When entering into an agreement to conduct a business between a lawyer and a client, a dispute arose as to who would be the party to the legal aid agreement: a lawyer or a bar?
The client insisted that the bar association was the party to the contract, since in this situation it is possible to replace one lawyer with another, the compensation of damage due to improper provision of legal assistance is more guaranteed. The lawyer believed that it was he, and not the bar, who should be the party to the treaty.
Who should be the party to the agreement in accordance with the Federal Law "On the Bar and the Bar in the Russian Federation"? What will be the solution of this issue if the lawyer works in a law office or in a lawyer´s office?
Task 3. Lawyers-partners of the law firm "Zashchita", having failed to pay rent payments for their office, decided to reorganize the bureau into a law firm of commercial orientation in order to be able to earn money other than legal and legal activities. Did the lawyers make the right decision?
Task 4. Simonov´s lawyer was called up for active military service. In this regard, the council of the Bar of the Sverdlovsk region decided to terminate the status of lawyer Simonov. Is the decision of the council lawful? Could Simonov appeal against him? Is the decision of the council on termination of the status of a lawyer lawful, if Simonov signed a contract for military service?
Assignment 5. While attending the materials of the criminal case against Fedkin, accused of theft, he found that the report of a police officer on the detection of signs of a crime, the protocol of the inspection of the scene of the incident, and the protocol for the seizure of stolen items were drawn up with gross violations of the law. How should a lawyer do?
Task 6. Shadrin bought a bottle of vodka and decided to drink it at the entrance of the nearest house. At the garbage chute in the house, he found a backpack. Shadrin drank vodka, took a backpack and left. The backpack belonged to Kovrov, who returned from the garden and briefly left, leaving his backpack in the garbage chute, and when he came back, there was no backpack.
The state prosecutor, speaking in the judicial debate, proposed to classify Shadrin´s actions under Part 1 of Art. 158 of the Criminal Code.
What can be the position of the defense in this case? (The actual circumstances of the case are not contested by the defense).